Veritas Facade capability

Elevation and 3D mapping

Locate facade findings against elevations, zones, drops and 3D context so stakeholders can see where work is needed without reconstructing drawings from memory.

Book a demo Request workspace access

Elevation and 3D mapping give each facade finding a place in the building, not only a description. Veritas Facade supports location references such as elevation, zone, BMU drop and window position, and can connect defects into the broader 3D and point-cloud context used for stakeholder review.

Owners and facility managers rarely want a paragraph that says "north elevation, mid-level crack." They want a navigable place in the record. Mapping is how the inspection becomes usable for budgeting, contractor briefing and year-on-year comparison.

When LiDAR or photogrammetry packages are commissioned, the same defect record can sit against the visual model rather than living only in a PDF appendix.

The problem this solves

Without location discipline, defect registers become hard to brief. Contractors bid against ambiguous notes, engineers re-walk areas already inspected, and boards struggle to understand concentration of risk.

Scattered photos without elevation or zone context also make it difficult to prove that a later repair closed the same finding that was originally recorded.

Workflow narrative

1. Establish building geometry context
Confirm elevations, zones and access drops relevant to the inspection scope.
2. Pin findings to locations
Attach each defect to elevation, zone, drop or window references during capture or review.
3. Review in spatial context
Use mapped locations and, where available, 3D or point-cloud views to communicate concentration and access implications.
4. Carry locations into remediation
Preserve location references when findings become remediation packages so contractors inherit the same context.

In the product

Verified product evidence

High-rise facade elevations — Field imagery illustrating multi-elevation facade context that mapping workflows locate defects against.

Built-asset spatial context — Supporting imagery for spatial asset context used when defects are reviewed against building fabric.

Outcomes

Faster contractor and engineer briefing
Clearer risk concentration by elevation or zone
Better continuity between inspections over time
Less ambiguity in remediation scopes

Applicable standards

AS 4349.0:2007Inspection of buildings - general requirements
AS/NZS 4284:2008Testing of building facades
Project survey controlSite-specific elevation and drop naming conventions

Limitations

3D package dependency

Interactive 3D and point-cloud depth depend on commissioned scanning or photogrammetry packages, which are scoped separately.

Naming consistency

Elevation and drop naming must be agreed early or mapped findings become inconsistent across crews.

FAQ

Common questions

Do we need LiDAR to use location mapping?

No. Elevation, zone, drop and window references work without LiDAR. LiDAR and photogrammetry deepen the visual record when commissioned.

Can clients see mapped defects?

Authorised client portal views can present inspection findings with location context according to share and access settings.

How does this help remediation?

Contractors inherit the same location references used during inspection, reducing rework caused by ambiguous descriptions.

Is every building modelled in 3D automatically?

No. 3D and point-cloud assets are created when those services are commissioned for the asset.

Book a demo of Elevation and 3D mapping

See this capability in the live Veritas Inspect workspace. Workspace provisioning is operator-led after commercial setup.

Book a demo Request workspace access Sign in