Veritas Structures capability
Engineering review workflow
Route structural findings through internal or external engineering review pathways when the engagement requires professional endorsement.
Engineering review workflow is how Veritas Structures handles engagements that need professional scrutiny beyond field capture. Findings, photos and classifications feed a review pathway so engineers can validate, comment and endorse according to scope.
This is an explicit pathway, not an automatic claim that every inspection is engineer-certified. External or specialist engineering endorsement is engagement-dependent and should be confirmed during commercial setup.
The workflow preserves the chain from field evidence to review outcome so later questions can be answered from the record rather than reconstructed email threads.
The problem this solves
Many teams need engineering input but manage it outside the inspection record. Review comments sit in inboxes, versions diverge, and the issued report no longer matches the evidence trail.
An integrated review pathway keeps endorsement, comments and findings in one auditable chain.
Workflow narrative
- 1. Complete field capture
Confirm findings, photos and classifications are ready for review.
- 2. Submit for engineering review
Route the inspection to internal or external reviewers according to workspace process.
- 3. Review and comment
Engineers validate severity, methodology and recommendations within the platform record.
- 4. Issue with endorsement context
Release the report pathway with review outcomes retained in the inspection history.
In the product
Verified product evidence
Outcomes
- Clear separation between field capture and engineering endorsement
- Auditable review trail linked to evidence
- Faster turnaround when review is in-platform
- Reduced version confusion between stakeholders
Applicable standards
- Engagement scopeProfessional responsibilities defined by commercial and regulatory requirements
- AS 3600:2018Concrete structures - assessment references
Limitations
External engineering is engagement-dependent
Third-party or specialist engineering endorsement is not implied for every workspace or report.
Reviewer availability
Turnaround depends on assigned engineers and engagement scope, not software alone.
FAQ
Common questions
Is every structural report engineer-certified?
Can external engineers access the record?
Does review happen before or after report generation?
What if we only need internal QA review?
Related Structures capabilities
Structural inspection software
Record structural defects in the field with structured severity, location context and photo evidence that flows straight into the inspection record and asset register.
Structural asset register
Maintain a living structural asset register where findings, photos and severity views persist beyond any single PDF deliverable.
Recurring inspections
Schedule and run recurring structural inspection programmes with baseline comparison against prior register history.
Structural condition reports
Turn structured structural findings into professional condition reports, with optional engineering review pathways where the engagement requires it.
Book a demo of Engineering review workflow
See this capability in the live Veritas Inspect workspace. Workspace provisioning is operator-led after commercial setup.